Showing posts with label bruce james. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bruce james. Show all posts

Thursday, 9 June 2011

I Met A Man Who Wasn't There , White Rock Theatre ,Hastings

I Met A Man Who Wasn't There 

Cast
Amanda Schilling (Journalist) - Cathy Shipton
Edgar Ryme (Clairvoyant) - Brian Capron

9-11 June 2011
performance seen 9th June

Or I could rename this I Sat In An Audience Who Weren't There

Now I have sat in some pitifully small audiences lately but this was small to the extent that I am surprised Brian and Cathy went ahead with this. There were 4 of us in the front row followed by row after row of empty seats with just an odd person dotted here and there and a couple of small groups at the back.

If there were as many as 50 people I'd be surprised. It really did seem truly weird sitting in such an empty, cold feeling, auditorium.

I guess it may not be helped that the White Rock Theatre haven't used Twitter for almost 2 months (Twitter ID @The_White_Rock) to keep their followers updated. I honestly don't know how much effect social networking has with putting a few bums on seats but, when it costs zero to do so, surely you try anything?

Other than the price of tickets, I honestly can't fathom why the figures were that appalling. Here are people who I consider to be very fine actors and who are performing for Bruce James Productions who have been respected over many years for staging many popular shows to suit all tastes.

OK there was one recently I didn't enjoy, OK hated actually, but people aren't going to rave over every show they see and to be fair I've still not found a soul who did like it.

I met a man who wasn't there is a totally different kettle of fish. Journalist Amanda Schilling is visiting clairvoyant Edgar Ryme to undertake an interview. Unsurprisingly it's not as simple as that and Schilling gets far more than she bargained for from the very mysterious Ryme. But does Cathy Shipton end up being a casualty? (I know terrible pun) Does she deserves what she gets?

It's a spooky tale with a good balance of humour and drama. The story is believable (especially if you believe in ghosts) and easy to follow. Capron and Shipton deliver the fine performances you would expect.

For me there were just two issues. One is something that happens in so many plays and I hasten to add not specific to James productions. That is that the first half leading the audience to the traditional interval cliffhanger seems very drawn out.

There are plays that can have you gripped from the off, you find yourself just absorbed in proceedings. Indeed my next review will be of a show that is just that. Then there are those, like this one, where it takes quite a while for the 'scene setting' to take place.

My second issue is lack of atmosphere but this was purely down to the lack of audience. I think any play suffers from a lack of viewers and this was no exception. No oooohs, no aaahs , nobody jumping at moments when they are meant to. Between sets you are never quite sure whether to applaud or not because there's a danger somebody might just throw you a fish for your efforts. Then there's laughter  - you laugh at a line and believe you're the only one that did - was it meant to be funny? Do I have a warped sense of humour? Or did the joke just go over the heads of everybody else?

Back to that first half and it showed that the initial build up was failing to hold the attention when from high above the stage a rectangular piece of paper about 2"x1" slowly descended into the auditorium. A slow decent it was indeed because being the shape it was it just rolled over and over and fluttered gently down. It caught my eye, but when it was about half way down I remembered it was not part of the show and looked around and everybody was doing the same. I thought I was bad getting distracted by such a small thing but by sheer fluke it landed at the feet of one of the few audience members. Clearly the temptation to look at it outweighed the onstage action as she bent down to pick it up and examined it.

I know I laughed at this point. Here we are watching a ghost story involving clairvoyancy and I had to wonder if she was expecting a message from the other side?

Anyway, the few of us that were there got back to reality. Once you know who's who and Schilling's and Ryme's backgrounds have been explained this is actually an extremely enjoyable drama. As with all similar tales things are never what they seem with the characters and there are the twists and turns you expect to keep you fascinated. This makes the second half very entertaining indeed.

These are really hard times for theatre and it was somewhat heartbreaking seeing two well known 'household' names such as Brian Capron and Cathy Shipton unable to attract even a moderate audience. Even describing it as a small audience seems an exaggeration.

It really is getting to a stage where whoever decides on ticket prices has to think about whether they can be justified to continue at current levels. Not just for this show but for all shows, everywhere. 

Audience levels are getting down to pathetic numbers. Take this production as an example. Prices ranged from £13.50 to £18.50. I'm no marketing or economics expert but if a price cut of approx 30% was set making tickets £9.50 to £13.50 I'm sure the under £10 tickets would have filled a darned site more of the auditorium then we experienced and I daresay net takings would have been much higher.

It's about supply and demand. When petrol prices reached their peak and people stopped filling tanks the oil companies reduced prices. Wake up theatre land the Government is slashing arts budgets enough and if you don't start getting folks enjoying live entertainment at a price they can afford they are not going to come and once they stop it's going to be harder than ever to get them back.

Don't people in the theatre industry get together to discuss audience numbers, prices and current issues? If they don't it's high time they started otherwise we will see theatres going the same way the Public Houses have - closed, sold off, demolished or converted into trendy wine bars or housing.

If you ask anyone who goes to the theatre why they don't go so much the answer is always price of tickets. So powers that be in theatre wake up and smell the coffee because it's starting to get cold.

Tuesday, 22 March 2011

The Black Veil Devonshire Park Theatre

The Black Veil
"a chilling thriller"
Devonshire Park Theatre
Eastbourne
22-26 March 2011

Show seen 22 March

Cast

The Man - Nick Murphy
The Woman - Jen Holt
Luke  - Toby Trimby **

** Understudy appearing in place of indisposed Nick Barclay

I have always thoroughly enjoyed the numerous Bruce James productions we have seen over many, many years................. until now.

If you have come here expecting anything different than the views of the 'official' critics I'm afraid you are about to encounter more of the same. To be honest because we only see shows we think we will enjoy as opposed to being paid to watch anything that comes along you would think my verdict may be more favourable.

It isn't.

In this Dickens short story a mysterious old woman wearing a black veil and completely clad in black clothing seeks the services of a new doctor, who she knows is looking for new patients, to save her dying grandson.

The whole of the first half is dialogue between the doctor and the veiled woman covering her apparent situation and his colourful background and it goes on...... and on .... and on. It rambles on to such an extent that you actually switch off altogether. When you know the show is a very short one anyway and people are still looking at watches long before the interval you know all is not well.

On a slightly different subject what is your pet hate in the theatre? People coughing continually, phones ringing, watches beeping, the constant rustling of sweet bags?

Well whatever you prefer this predominantly elderly Eastbourne audience inconsiderately served us the full monty in the first half. However, given that there was more action in the audience than on the stage perhaps we should have all joined in?

You've heard of a no expense spared set? Well welcome to the no expense spent set. The 'settings' include the doctor's reception room with him in front of a warm fire, the dirty streets of Victorian London, a grotty London flat and a watermill. At least this is what you have to imagine because asides for some board supports, a chair and a bed this is one empty set.

Not so much as a front door or a picture of the warm fire - zilch!

This results in a production where you can never really sense that Victorian London  atmosphere and I have to wonder if just a little effort may have made this seem very different indeed?

The corpse just wouldn't stay still, a point noticed by so many. No you can't stay totally motionless but hey this body was even behind a curtain and it was still seen to move. If you can't find an extra who can lay still for goodness sake go to Debenhams and borrow a mannequin.

The programme is £2.50 and very poor value compared to others with not even a picture of the current cast members. Along the road at the Congress Theatre Spamalot's programme is £2 much thicker and with great content for the price. In fact you could justify £2.50 for Spamalot's publication.

As for cast members that's another subject. Fair enough Eastbourne Theatres quite rightly point out that the pictures on its web site are of a previous cast but look at Bruce James official website and the previous "star cast" is still listed.

Last years production had a 'star' in the lead, former Eastenders star, James Alexandrou (played Martin Fowler) to provide some interest. He is still on James website with his co-stars at the time Beatrice Curnew and Andrew Ryan.

This cast is totally different and even the programme credited cast couldn't be achieved as understudy Toby Trimby was forced to fill the shoes of Nick Barclay as Luke.

My stars awarded at the end of this review are for the cast and the cast alone Nick Murphy does nothing wrong in his role as the doctor, Jen Holt maintains her London accent and mysteriousness perfectly and whilst Toby stumbled over several lines as bad boy Luke it was nothing that he didn't recover from quickly. Besides, we all stumble with language in real life and I admire any understudy that has to step in.

No cast you are not the problem but just about everything else is. The first half is nothing short of mind numbingly boring and whilst the second half does liven things up the lack of a set and by that time a rather predictable outcome means that at no stage is this the chiller promised. If this ever was a chiller it's time we called in the refrigeration engineer to give this production a well overdue service.

I enjoy promoting theatre but I will not promote theatre for the sake of it when a production is simply not good enough and this isn't.

"I don't like theatre" is a common reason from those who don't go. The trouble is if you took a theatre doubter along to see The Black Veil as it is you would do nothing whatsoever to change their mind.

It's funny but we saw the very amusing Spamalot the following evening with the adapted song "You won't succeed in Eastbourne without a star". I couldn't help but sit there listening to that song and relating back to this show. This is a show without a celebrity star, yet wherever you look the previously featured celebrity is still advertised. I find that to be a little deceptive to be honest and I think that any advertising promoting the booking of this show should either feature the actual cast or just the Black Veil image as featured on programmes.

As it stands it just looks as though the producers are desperately keeping their previous 'star' pictured in the hope this may bring a few additional people to see a production that is already getting many poor reviews.

That is not fair on theatre goers as it is misleading, it is not complimentary to the current cast, who are trying to do their very best with an awful play and it is not fair on James Alexandrou either who may just be anticipated at each venue by some.

This is a very rare below average mark from me but. once again it's not directed at a hard working cast but the poor material and set they are having to work with.

Wednesday, 10 June 2009

Strictly Murder Review Mark Moraghan Devonshire Park Theatre Eastbourne 10th June 2009

Strictly Murder
Devonshire Park Theatre
Eastbourne
9th-13th June 2009
Performance seen
Wednesday, June 10th

Strictly Murder starring Mark Moraghan
Cast (Appearance Order)

Josef : David Rumelle
Peter Meredith : Nick Barclay
Suzy Hinchcliffe : Katy Funk
Ross : Mark Moraghan
Miriam Miller : Jasmine Darke

This thrilling murder mystery takes place in a rustic cottage in a valley in Provence, France, at the start of the World war II.

Mark Moraghan stars as Ross in Strictly MurderMark Moraghan, former star of The Bill, Heartbeat, Where The Heart is (and many more), is the more well known "headline celebrity" in this intense drama.

But when it comes down to delivery of performance all 5 stars are on an equal footing.

Take Katie Funk, for example. Only last year we had watched her play multiple roles in the stage comedy farce, Affairs In a Tent, in which she was hilarious. But here we are just a few months on and she has switched to what must be an emotionally draining role as Suzy Hinchcliffe. It's a stunning performace as she endeavours to find out why partner Peter Meredith (Nick Barclay) just will not commit to marriage.

Barclay has a massive list of theatre credits, not just in the UK. Whilst he has done the odd comedy his long theatrical career history does seem to sway more towards the more serious dramas and murder mysteries. Even in Panto he seems to be snapped up quickly to play the villain.

But is he the villain in this? Well the only way to find out is to go and see it.

Katie Funk stars as Suzy Hinchcliffe in Strictly MurderBut see it you should as it is one of those mysteries that no matter what theory you have about the actual outcome you will more than likely be wrong. Just 5 actors delivering a story by Brian Clemens that has more twists and turns than Spaghetti Junction!

I feel some on-line reviews of this have given a little too much of the plot away in talking about Moraghan's character Ross. I enjoy plays more when I know nothing about the story so I'll just restrict it to saying he is superbly cast in this play and that his character is central to the plot. And believe me that gives away nothing!

Two final cast members remain to mention - David Rumelle and Jasmine Darke.

David plays Josef - a somewhat strange, tramp-like, sometimes dark yet often comical, character who lives near to Peter and Suzy. Josef doesn't say much - but he doesn't need to - Josef is a character who tells his story in actions rather than words and Rumelle excels playing this character.

As with the character of Ross I won't go into too much detail of Miriam Miller played by Jasmine Darke.

Darke doesn't have to appear on stage until the latter part of the second act and together with her fellow actors she brings the play to a very satisfying,unexpected, conclusion.

The key to the success of this superb Bruce James production is probably the fact that the mystery starts at curtain-up in Act 1 and it has the ability to keep you gripped and guessing to the very end. Many plays have a "flat period" at the beginning where you get to learn the backgrounds of the characters. And that is exactly why this drama works - because you learn about the characters gradually, with surprises always just around the corner.

For Bruce James Strictly Murder is just one of huge number of successful touring shows his company has produced. Comedies, dramas, musicals, murders - they are all on the list. I have decided that we must be fans of the work of this experienced repertory actor as we have seen so many of his productions. It seems if the Bruce James name is in the programme there is an almost certain chance of enjoying the show.

It certainly applies here!
5 out of 5 for Strictly Murder 2009 theatre tour